pronounced tie-see
Menu
Menu
Choosing a commercial print vendor requires comparing five things: capabilities, quality, turnaround, service and total cost. The right vendor—or combination of vendors—will depend on which of those factors matter most to your organization and how well each supplier fits the work you actually produce.
The mistake is allowing one factor, usually unit price, to make the decision by itself.
Here are eight practical tips for evaluating commercial printing companies and choosing a partner that can deliver the best overall value.
Start by ranking capabilities, quality, turnaround, service and cost based on your organization’s needs.
This seems simple, but it’s often more nuanced than it looks once you really get into it, and there are often competing perspectives within teams. This is where so much conflict, friction and frustration can be avoided—on your end—if your criteria accurately describe what your team really needs.
If you know you’ll need rapid print turn times to capitalize on opportunities or offset internal delays you can predict, make sure your vendor can do that. Do you know you’ll need a lot of consultative communication with your vendor? Are you struggling to manage the print assets and print logistics your organization is deploying? Does color accuracy matter or do you just need a few million mailpieces printed at the lowest possible cost?
Whatever the internal dynamics you’re solving for, how a specific print provider can support and add value to the entire scope of your needs describes the real value they offer. And that’s the advice here: search for maximum value by ranking your needs and using them to select your vendor(s). Best value doesn’t always hit your print budget directly—but it’s ultimately measured in dollars and yields the best ROI when all costs and results are considered.
Give prospective suppliers a realistic picture of the broadest print relationship you’re offering. There’s no reason to withhold real information that’ll enable them to evaluate the opportunity more accurately.
This matters because vendors use their assessment to determine fit, pricing and priority. A larger, well-defined program gives them more flexibility and a stronger incentive to offer favorable pricing.
That may include annual volumes, order frequency, asset types, versioning, seasonal spikes, delivery locations, mailing, inventory, kitting and fulfillment. The clearer the scope, the easier it is for a vendor to understand how well their production, workflow solutions, service model and technology are equipped to meet your needs.
In general, most print providers will tell you directly if something isn’t a good fit. And even if they don’t, that context will cause a bad fit to show up in how they price working with you.
That doesn’t mean every project needs to go to one printer. There’s a balance to be struck between vendor consolidation and optimum vendor partnerships. Carving every asset up to be produced by a specialized vendor means lots of duplicated management, logistics and administrative work for you. One vendor that’s not well equipped for meaningful portions of your print portfolio might cause price inefficiency that can’t justify lower admin costs.
Bottom line: being transparent helps you and your potential vendor(s) navigate to better outcomes more efficiently.
Commercial printing is custom manufacturing. The most efficient production method changes based on quantity, format, material, finishing, quality requirements and turnaround.
You don’t need to know which press should produce every piece. Instead, give vendors several representative projects and ask how they would manufacture and manage them.
It’s always a good idea to find out which capabilities are performed in-house and which rely on production partners. Outsourcing isn’t inherently a problem, particularly when specialty processes are involved. What matters is whether your core or highest-volume work aligns with the vendor’s strengths and who remains accountable for quality, scheduling and communication.
An equipment list can provide an experienced buyer with useful preliminary screening information, but a clear production plan tells you much more about how well the vendor understands your work.
Some of the biggest print challenges happen before and after the press run.
Producing 100,000 identical brochures is one type of job. Producing 40 versions, managing location-level approvals and shipping the correct quantities to 200 destinations is something else entirely.
Each additional version, user, approval and destination creates another opportunity for manual effort or error. The right supporting technology can absorb that complexity without passing it back to your team.
Depending on your program, that may involve an online ordering portal, permission-based asset access, variable-data automation, inventory controls, custom integrations, reporting, kitting or multi-location fulfillment. If customer or company data is involved, security and access controls should also be part of the evaluation.
The simplest way to test these capabilities is with a realistic scenario. Ask each vendor to walk you through how a representative order would move from request and approval through production, quality control and delivery. You’ll learn more from that conversation than you will from anything on their website.
If you’re using an RFP/RFQ process to screen ahead of conversational screening, make sure you’re surveying for support, technology, security and any other relevant “non-production” vendor attributes you value.
Most capable printers can show you an impressive sample. The more important question is whether they can deliver that quality consistently across an entire order—and then repeat it on the next one.
Ask how files are inspected, how proofs are produced and approved, how color is managed and how finished work is evaluated. If your print needs span many substrates or you need a mix of relatively large and small assets, that’ll require different printers or “print devices” to be used. Find out how the printer maintains consistency between them. Certifications such as G7 can provide useful evidence of process control when color consistency is important, but no credential replaces a discussion about your actual expectations.
Also ask what happens when something misses the mark. A vendor’s process for identifying, communicating and correcting a problem is part of its quality system.
For a substantial opportunity, consider assigning a representative test project. Choose something complex enough to reveal how the vendor prepares files, communicates, solves problems and controls the finished product.
Quality isn’t defined by the best piece in a run—it’s defined by hitting specs consistently.
Turnaround isn’t simply the number of days shown on an estimate. It includes quoting, file preparation, proofing, approvals, production, finishing and delivery.
Ask vendors to explain when their production clock begins, how material availability affects scheduling and what happens when files or approvals arrive late. Discuss rush work, peak periods and how potential delays are communicated.
Service is closely connected. Find out who will manage the day-to-day work, who provides coverage when that person is unavailable and how urgent issues are escalated. If response times, reporting or inventory updates are important, define those expectations instead of assuming every vendor approaches them the same way.
Pay attention to the vendor’s behavior during the evaluation. The speed and quality of its questions, follow-up and recommendations may be the best preview of the service you’ll receive later.
A low-priced vendor that requires constant supervision can quickly become expensive—in many ways.
Evaluate price after determining which vendors can meet your capability, quality, turnaround and service requirements.
First, make sure the quotes represent equivalent solutions. One vendor may include proofs, file preparation, freight, data processing or fulfillment while another lists them separately—or hasn’t accounted for them yet.
If there’s one place to stumble, it’s here. Ensure you don’t exclude the transparent vendors that are likely a better fit in favor of those that withheld admin fees and other hidden costs. There are real costs to managing inventory, shipping and handling and software solution maintenance. Expect transparency around how they’re handled and scrutinize vague or too-good-to-be-true pricing.
Finally, look at the value the vendor can create. A format change might unlock significant savings. A different way to manage production and inventory management could reduce real costs by deviating from how you’re envisioning an asset would be ordered. Combining work may improve production efficiency. Better mail preparation could reduce postage. An ordering portal might remove repetitive tasks from your team.
The goal is the lowest total burdened cost—not simply the lowest unit price. If your prospective vendors accurately understand what you’re trying to achieve, this is where the best-fit ones can create the most value.
A good partner is a competitive advantage and a strategic asset. Research and scorecards can narrow the field, but don’t make the final decision without meeting the people who would manage your work.
Treat the meeting more like an interview than a sales presentation. Pay attention to the questions the vendor asks you. Is the conversation focused primarily on equipment and pricing, or is the team trying to understand your objectives, workflow, internal workload and definition of success?
You’re evaluating more than production capabilities. You’re evaluating the people you’ll depend on when specifications change, deadlines tighten or a problem needs to be solved quickly.
If feasible, do it in person and tour the facility. Virtual meetings haven’t changed the fact that the best way to really get a sense of who you’re dealing with is to meet them and see their operations with your own eyes.
AI can play a useful role in selecting a new print vendor. From surveying your internal team about the attributes they prioritize to overlaying your print asset ecosystem on the vendors that are out there, AI can streamline the process. You can give it this article and see what it thinks—ask it to help you develop your decision matrices or prepare questions for your vendors.
If permitted, let it digest RFP responses and meeting transcripts across vendors to identify unanswered questions, pose new ones and look for mismatched assumptions. You can also give the complete analysis to a second AI model and ask it to audit the work for overlooked costs, unsupported conclusions and inconsistent comparisons.
For best results, use AI as an analyst and advisor, not the final decision-maker.
There is no single best commercial printer for every organization.
The right choice depends on what you produce, how complex the work is, how much support your team needs and what creates value for your organization. The best partner may not have the lowest quote or the longest equipment list. It will have the right combination of production capabilities, supporting technology, reliable quality and people who make the work easier to manage.
Define your priorities, evaluate vendors against your real scope and compare the complete value of each solution. That’s how you find a print partner that can protect your brand, reduce headaches and deliver when it matters. That sort of vendor partnership is a strategic advantage, and it’s worth the legwork to establish.
---
If you’re looking for a commercial print partner and Thysse’s broad capabilities match what you’re looking for, reach out. Our team is happy to offer insights and deeper capability discussion centered on your unique needs. Our goal is always to develop solutions and relationships that endure because of the value they create. We’re transparent about what we can and can’t do, so don’t hesitate to reach out.
